Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Lowering the standards on Christian fiction

I addressed this a bit on my other blog, and I have addressed the issue of cursing a few times already, but its been really bugging me.

There was a lot of discussion about a book that recently came out, My Stubborn Heart, by Becky Wade, published by Bethany House Publishers. There was a lot of dicussion on one blog - I can't remember it to link, and a newer Christian author, Mike Duran, blogged about it, actually thanking Bethany House "for dabbling in language and subject matter that is typically deemed taboo in Christian fiction circles." I wouldn't call the words she used curse words, but vulgar and inappropriate for a Christian book, and aren't words a Christian should be throwing around, even in a book. Duran's post really bugged me, and I commented either there or on the other blog that referenced him that he was basically saying "yeah for being vulgar! Yeah for offending people!" Oddly enough, the two books I have read by him contain nothing like the language he was cheering on. He writes for Charisma House, and I can't see them allowing it.

Other publishers have had worse words. Thomas Nelson led it, and Zondervan and Waterbook/Multnomah has joined the cursing bandwagon. I don't like to put in print any of the words, for someone would try to paint me as hypocrtical for sure, so let me get them across without saying them. These have appeared in Christian fiction:

1) The "d" word
2) The "s" word"
3) "King James Donkey"
4) Vulgar term for urinate
5) Hell, used as an expletive

Those are the worst, though Waterbrook topped that with a non-fiction book I just read. They had mutiple uses of the "f-word" abbreviated, but in a way that they may as well used it. Add "ing" to the word, take out the "uc", and that is what they used.

I am disturbed by this trend, and disturbed by those who defend it. I had a woman who claims to be a Christian admit she would have no issue with even the above word being used, and even sex scenes in Christian fiction. Really?! If we drag Christian fiction down that low, why even bother calling it that? Why even have it?

Adam Blumer, who though he only has one book under his belt, feels very strongly as I do. We had messaged back and forth some about the Becky Wade novel, and in an email to him, I asked this: "if these authors want to put cursing in their books, then why don't they just write secular?" He replied "Why not just write for secular? Because it's cool to be a Christian author who pushes the line and goes against convention." And I think he nails it. (Check out Adam's book, Fatal Illusions).

There are people who condemn and look down on Christian fiction. I have heard people refer to Christian novels in the same tone they would talk about some major sin of the day. And I'd like to briefly address that. Not all Christian ficion is equal. Some is just fluff. There is wide variety of Christian fiction: romance, suspense, historical, sci-fi - you name it, its there. Some just entertains, which there is nothing wrong with that. Some can encourage, inspire, even convict. There have been times in my life where I was struggling spiritually, and something I read in a Christian fiction book was a help to me. Jesus told stories often to make a point, so I think there is definite possibility of  Christian fiction book being a help.

That said, why not cursing in Christian books?

1) First off, Christians should not curse and use foul language. We are to be different. If we went around using curse words all the time, what kind of witness for Christ would we be? Not a very good one. Would you use that kind of language in front of your pastor and people from church? In front of your kids?

If there are words Christians should not use, and I think - I hope - we agree that there are - then why is it acceptable to put them in a book? If I let off with a string of profanity right here on my blog, would that make it ok since my mouth wasn't saying it? Of course not!!! And neither does it make it ok when it is in a book being spoken by a fictional character. It is still cursing, and it is still wrong.

One of the "pro-cursing" crowd on the one blog I mentioned, made the point that some words are offensive to some people and not others, trying to use the excuse its ok to use certain words, because not everyone is offended by the same words, and not everyone considers the same words to be vulgar and cursing. I replied and said if it is a word you wouldn't want your kid to blurt out in front of the pastor, or a word you wouldn't want certain people to hear you use, then it probably falls into the category of vulgar or cursing. It doesn't take rocket science to know what words are curse words and/or vulgar.

2) Christians are commanded in the Bible to not offend our brothers. Granted, this could be taken to extremes, but come on people..... cursing cannot be excused from this. It seriously boggles my mind that I have had Christian authors defend cursing in their books and not be apologetic at all about it, yet I have had non-Christians apologize for using those same words around me, and I never said a word. They knew I was a Christian, and knew I didn't talk like that.

3) It is tearing down the lines between secular and Christian fiction. If there is cursing in Christian fiction, and God forbid, sex scenes, which will be next - then why have Christian fiction at all? There should be differences between the two, and one difference is language. If there is no difference between secular and Christian, then why have Christian?

I never watched much TV, not having one after the age of 11, so maybe that is one reason this is a big issue to me. I haven't been as desensitized to it as people who watch a lot of TV. I don't know. Maybe that isn't the reason, but why are so many Christians ok with cursing in Christian books? I seriously don't get it.

One woman told me we should leave it up to the author. Maybe they have a reason for doing it, and its between them and God. I politely disagree. When I buy a Christian book, I expect certain things from it, and one is no cursing/vulgarity. It isn't just between them and God.

3) Even non-Christians get it. I was talking to a friend of mine who doesn't claim to be a Christian and its evident by their life. I was talking about the language in this one Christian book I had read. They were shocked. "That was in a Christian book?! You're kidding!" This person was truly shocked and said it shouldn't be in there. If a non-Christian gets that, why can't Christians?

There are probably other reasons people smarter than me could come up with, but those are a couple I came up with.

A while back I read and reviewed a book by Susan May Warren, Sons of Thunder. It had one use of the "d-word", and my sister and I both sent her a polite email about it. She replied and said that was the word her character would have used, and she wanted to stay true to his character. I thought this  - and think I replied to her - "so if he was the kind of guy to say the "f-word", would you have used it? Authors are creative, and can get across what kind of person the character is without him actually using the word.

Some time before I read the above book, I read a novel by Noel Hynd (Zondervan Publishing). It was suspense and centered around the FBI. Great plot and writing, but...... it had several language issues. What most people could classify as cursing. I remember the "d-word" and "King James Donkey", and there was one or two others, used more than once. I sent him a polite email. He replied that you cannot write that kind of novel without using that kind of language. You.Have. Got. To. Be. Kidding. (Then he should stick to secular!) I have read a lot of that kind of book that didn't use that kind of language. Maybe Mr. Hynd needs to meet Bob Hamer. Bob is a former FBI agent who has written two great Christian books about an FBI agent. And guess what....... no cursing. Wow. If a real, live, former FBI agent can do it, then I would wager a guess that even Mr. Hynd can do it. He just doesn't want to, and doesn't care. That was the last book I read by Noel Hynd.

I've thought a lot about this issue of Christians being different from the world/non-Christians. Nothing is wrong anymore. Even sexual sins are accepted by some churches and Christians, so I guess it should be no surprise that Christians would defend cursing.

This statement will go not go over well. I know we are not to judge, but the same Bible also says people will be known by their fruits. If a person claimed to be a Christian, and was continually cursing around other Christians, and when confronted about it being offensive, just kept doing it...... what would we think of their Christianity? Really - what would we think? So if a person who claims to be a Christian author and publisher keeps cursing in their books, and when confronted and told it is offensive, and they keep doing it........ well, fill in the blanks.

To condemn sinful and un-Christian behavior can get you labeled narrow-minded by even other Christians (check out Mike Duran's blog, he infers that). And that is sad. So I am sure I will get that label.

Just think, not that many years ago, people on TV and radio got bleeped out for the same words that are appearing in Christian novels. Wow, what wonderful progress. Can we honestly think that is ok, and even worse, like Mike Duran, cheer on profanity?

I've thrown this idea out before, but doubt it will happen, but if Christian publishers and authors are going to insist on putting vulgar language and cursing in their books, then I suggest a couple of ideas:

1) Put a notice on the back of the book. Something like "This book contains some language that could be offensive to some people"

2) Make a special imprint for books that contain that kind of language, and market it as such.

Sound dumb? I don't think so. We rate movies, why not books?

In closing, I'd like to share something Michael Hyatt, CEO of Thomas Nelson, had on his blog. They are standards for their books. I commented once and said I don't think cursing in their books line up with the standards. He didn't agree, nor did I think he liked the comment. Read them and see what you think...... with the standards he outlines, should not their books - and all Christian books - be held to a higher standard, language-wise, and others?

It can also be found here.
"At Thomas Nelson, we often refer to ourselves as “a Christian content company.” However, we understand our identity as a Christian content provider in a very different way than most of our competitors.

Like them, we want all of our messages to be delivered from the perspective of a Christian worldview. This is the foundation of our content program. However, unlike many of them, our communicators are free to explore any subject they wish.
Yes, we publish content and host conferences on spiritual and devotional themes. This is part of life and, from our perspective, the most important part. But it is not the only part.We also deliver content that deals with the other aspects of life: business, culture, politics, entertainment, etiquette, cooking, family, etc. And, of course, we publish fiction. Lots of it! No topic is off limits, provided it comes from a Christian worldview, is executed well, and has commercial value. (We are, after all, a commercial content provider.)
Theologically, our vision flows from our conviction that God is sovereign. He doesn’t preside over part of the world (the “religious sphere”), leaving the rest autonomous (the “secular sphere”). No, He rules over all of it. Ultimately, there is no secular/sacred dichotomy. Because God is the Creator and ruler over all, any field of human inquiry can be explored—and sanctified.
To say it another way, all truth is God’s truth. Some of the content we distribute will beexplicitly Christian (mentioning the name “Jesus” or citing specific Bible verses); other content will be implicitly Christian (never referencing anything spiritual). Both are acceptable and appropriate, depending on the communicator’s purpose and audience. The important thing is that the content flow out of a Christian worldview.
And that necessarily begins with the communicator. As a result, our standards focus on the content originator. This doesn’t mean that the content is unimportant. Quite the contrary. But it does reflect our belief that content flows out of a worldview and, ultimately, out of a writer or speaker’s heart (cf. Matthew 12:34, 35). To say it another way, we want to align ourselves with people who share our vision, our mission, and our values. “How can two walk together unless they agree” (Amos 3:3)? This is where it starts.
Specifically, we want to publish and promote:
  1. Communicators who profess a personal faith in Jesus Christ. We want to work with people who are willing to say, “I am a Christian.” We do not try to judge their profession or assess the validity of their faith. Only God knows their hearts (1 Samuel 16:7). Nevertheless, we want to work with communicators who claim to be Christians and are not ashamed of it.
  2. Communicators who embrace the central truths of historic Christianity.Such ancient documents as the Apostles’ and Nicene Creeds are simply convenient summaries of these truths and nearly all Christians can agree on them. Beyond these basic truths, we want to allow latitude—and even disagreement!—on non-core doctrines.
  3. Communicators who seek to live according to the standards of biblical morality. We do not expect perfection. We acknowledge that all Christians—even Christian communicators—fall short of God’s standards. But we want to promote communicators who are committed to living in obedience to God’s revealed will. We want to promote communicators who “walk the talk.”
Beyond these standards, there is freedom. Philippians 4:8 provides the inspiration for an expansive content program. It says,
Finally, brethren, whatever things are true, whatever things are noble, whatever things are just, whatever things are pure, whatever things are lovely, whatever things are of good report, if there is any virtue and if there is anything praiseworthy—meditate on these things.”
Notice the word whatever. It is repeated six times and then followed by the word anything.Based on this verse, we believe that Christians are free to think, write, or speak about anything—whatever they want!—provided it meets eight minimal criteria:
  1. It must be true. This means that it must be authentic and must correspond to reality. We want to promote content that embraces reality as God created it, not content that “sugar coats” reality or tries to make reality something it is not.
  2. It must be noble. This means that it must raise us up and make us more like God. The opposite is to debase or degrade. We want to promote content that ultimately motivates people and calls forth their best qualities.
  3. It must be just. This means it must be righteous or consistent with the commandments of God. It also means it must be fair. We want to promote content that promotes righteousness and godly living. By the way, this doesn’t mean that novels can’t have evil characters. (There are plenty of them in God’s story.) But it does mean that in the end righteousness is rewarded and evil punished—if not in this life, the next.
  4. It must be pure. This means it must be chaste, modest, clean. We want to promote content that promotes holiness and offers a necessary corrective to current trends to sexualize everything. This does not mean that we are opposed to sex, of course. But we want to make sure that our content advocates a view of sex that is consistent with Christian morality.
  5. It is lovely. This means it must be aesthetically pleasing or beautiful. We want to publish communicators who are committed to beautiful writing and speaking. Bothwhat is said and how it is said are important. Beauty is not a means to an end. It is an end in itself, because it reflects the beauty of the Creator.
  6. It is of good report. This means it must be commendable or of high reputation. Again, the emphasis is on that which represents the best, that which anyone could read or hear and agree that it is well-written or well-spoken.
  7. It is virtuous. This means it must affirm behavior which is consistent with the highest values. Values that don’t manifest themselves in behavior are merely platitudes. We want to promote content that challenges people to live lives of moral excellence and virtue.
  8. It is praiseworthy. This means it must be worthy of recommendation; something you can personally endorse. At the end of the day, we want to promote content we are proud of, books or conferences that we are willing to recommend to a family member or friend with the confidence that they will wowed and grateful that they took the time to enjoy it.
The reason we have content standards is because we want to be faithful to Christ as we fulfill His call on our lives. And we also want our customers to be able to trust us. We want people to have confidence that our products are consistent with a Christian worldview, are created by people who profess to be Christians and are striving to walk the talk, regardless of the subject matter they may be addressing."

7 comments:

Annette said...

I've been so busy reading and reviewing books I guess I'm out of the loop with curse words being used in Christian fiction books.
To me what sets the dividing difference, and it is a divide, is the Christ-like story in the book. A Gospel message may not be placed in the fiction story, yet the characters are living out their Christ-like life in actions and words. As you stated in your post what would really be the difference in a Christian fiction book and in a secular fiction book? As Christians we are to live our lives and our words not as the world lives. We are to stand apart and be not yolked together with them. We live among them but we do not live like them. Yet, so many even Christians think that what they do and say is "right in their own eyes." You've written a great post, thank you!

Adam Blumer said...

Some excellent thoughts here, Mark, based on Scriptural principles. (And, by the way. if we can't go to the Word, where else can we go? Based on some discussion I've seen, you'd think Scripture was a secondary consideration.) Do you mind if I add more perspective?

For a decade I worked in the bubble of a Christian college. Then I worked FedEx for nine months. Oh my! The stuff that came out of people's mouths could have curled hair. But soon employees realized I was a Christian, and they curbed their language to some degree. Some employees even confronted other employees who cursed or used vulgar language in my presence. Some even apologized. But get this: I never once said a word to them about language. They INSTINCTIVELY KNEW that because I was a Christian, bad language in my presence was inappropriate. Even the world gets this. Why can't Christians?

A lot of Christian writers think good Christian fiction must be gritty, realistic fiction (curse words and all). It isn't true. Many of us have endured my FedEx experience, which was NOT entertaining. It was work in the real WORLD. Why would I want to read a Christian novel featuring the same language I had to hear at FedEx? I don't. Christian fiction should be an oasis amid the harsh realism around us. Should it tackle real-world issues? Absolutely. Should its language make followers of Christ cringe? No. There are plenty of FedEx employees who do that already. I don't need a Christian novel (that bears Christ's name, by the way) to do that for them.

Bad language in Christian fiction? Realism is a lame excuse.

Steve said...

How does violence fit in to this discussion? Many Christian books use violence quite freely. Do we apply a different standard here?

Nicholas Nieblas said...

First off, there is nothing that is inherently wrong in any word. One saying "s***" is not imediately sinning by having that word formulated in their mind or having that word leave their lips. How that word is used and the intent behind it is a matter of the heart, to which, as we know, God only knows our hearts.

Let me ask, would God be more pleased with a cursing servant saved by grace who seeks out the sick, lost and poor or a clean-mouthed Bible reading, church going workless Christian who is also saved by grace? I say this only to illustrate that you cannot have a narrow view of language, nor a narrow view of who or what a Christian is and should be. Christians are followers of Jesus Christ who are saved by faith in Him. Focusing on things like foul language is trivial.

Jesus often used offensive terms, we don't find them offensive because we don't use those terms in our society. But because of the things Jesus said (and did), He was killed. So Jesus, obviously offended people. And maybe they needed to be offended.

In the bible, Jesus used bad words for bad things and good words for good things. Why is it so much worse to do the same in Christian fiction?

On a more practical level, why is it wrong to represent the characters that are being written about in a more truthful, real and compelling way?

When I read a book and the witchcraft practicing atheist says "darn", it is upsetting to me because it is not true to life. I know atheists who love their colorful language and would think nothing of dropping any 4-letter expletive in a much milder scene or circumstance.

When it comes to not using those terms in front of a Pastor, people at church and children, I agree that these words are adult words that are not to be used “willy-nilly” (yes, I used the word “adult” AND “willy-nilly” in the same sentence). If such words offend people, you might not want to continue to use them (unless that is your purpose, of course), but that is why no one is forcing you to read a book that may have that language in it. But just having the genre of Christian Fiction on the label, should that mean you pick it up and it is watered down and shielded from any realism that might have entered its pages?

I have had a difficult time finding any pastor that hasn’t said that Saving Private Ryan is a fantastic movie. That movie is obviously rated-R. Yet it is a great movie, why? It’s artistry, realism and plot. No the foul language used in the movie did not make the movie, but it did allow for an accurate portrayal of war and people.

I would seek most in this issue to not limit Christian authors in their efforts to share the Gospel while reaching as many people as they can, while writing the most compelling story they can write.

One of the most sincere prayers I have heard was from a high school student who was just coming to God by saying “I’m tired of this s***”, in reference to his life without Christ. Whether that is wrong or not, it was honest and I believe that God honors that. He knows everything and He knows the heart. What came out of that young man's mouth was a cry from his heart to the heart of God.

Nicholas Nieblas said...

First off, there is nothing that is inherently wrong in any word. One saying "s***" is not imediately sinning by having that word formulated in their mind or having that word leave their lips. How that word is used and the intent behind it is a matter of the heart, to which, as we know, God only knows our hearts.

Let me ask, would God be more pleased with a cursing servant saved by grace who seeks out the sick, lost and poor or a clean-mouthed Bible reading, church going workless Christian who is also saved by grace? I say this only to illustrate that you cannot have a narrow view of language, nor a narrow view of who or what a Christian is and should be. Christians are followers of Jesus Christ who are saved by faith in Him. Focusing on things like foul language is trivial.

Jesus often used offensive terms, we don't find them offensive because we don't use those terms in our society. But because of the things Jesus said (and did), He was killed. So Jesus, obviously offended people. And maybe they needed to be offended.

In the bible, Jesus used bad words for bad things and good words for good things. Why is it so much worse to do the same in Christian fiction?

On a more practical level, why is it wrong to represent the characters that are being written about in a more truthful, real and compelling way?

When I read a book and the witchcraft practicing atheist says "darn", it is upsetting to me because it is not true to life. I know atheists who love their colorful language and would think nothing of dropping any 4-letter expletive in a much milder scene or circumstance.

When it comes to not using those terms in front of a Pastor, people at church and children, I agree that these words are adult words that are not to be used “willy-nilly” (yes, I used the word “adult” AND “willy-nilly” in the same sentence). If such words offend people, you might not want to continue to use them (unless that is your purpose, of course), but that is why no one is forcing you to read a book that may have that language in it. But just having the genre of Christian Fiction on the label, should that mean you pick it up and it is watered down and shielded from any realism that might have entered its pages?

I have had a difficult time finding any pastor that hasn’t said that Saving Private Ryan is a fantastic movie. That movie is obviously rated-R. Yet it is a great movie, why? It’s artistry, realism and plot. No the foul language used in the movie did not make the movie, but it did allow for an accurate portrayal of war and people.

I would seek most in this issue to not limit Christian authors in their efforts to share the Gospel while reaching as many people as they can, while writing the most compelling story they can write.

One of the most sincere prayers I have heard was from a high school student who was just coming to God by saying “I’m tired of this s***”, in reference to his life without Christ. Whether that is wrong or not, it was honest and I believe that God honors that. He knows everything and He knows the heart. What came out of that young man's mouth was a cry from his heart to the heart of God.

jeddom said...

Realism, as you say, is NOT an excuse; it IS however, a perfectly valid reason. If you create a particular character, that character should speak in a mode that reflects that character's culture, social status, or personal upbringing, etc. If the author fails to do this, the author has failed to do her job. Period. End of story. Besides, what a wonderful opportunity to show the radical way a character might be transformed if they come to Christ. Research St. Paul's course use of common Greek. Even the scriptures have been cleaned up a bit ( not God's intent).

Bluerose said...

Thank you for such a wonderful, well thought out post! I'm saddened that your opinion is very much in the minority these days, but I agree with you completely!